General Resolution on the Need for the Theory of Macroevolution to Be Taught Objectively
PLEASE NOTE: This resolution does not promote "six-day creationism." Rather, it emphasizes the need for the theory of macroevolution to be taught objectively, even assuming the multitudinous forms of life on earth have come into existence over a period of millions of years.
|WHEREAS the theory of macroevolution teaches that: (1) the first form of life came into existence through the random interaction of molecules in a "primordial soup"; and (2) all forms of life thereafter have come into existence through the operation of natural selection on randomly-produced genetic mutations;
WHEREAS macroevolution is to be distinguished from microevolution, which refers to the operation of natural selection within a species and which is an established fact;
WHEREAS there are very serious scientific problems with the theory of macroevolution, even assuming the multitudinous forms of life on earth have come into existence over a period of millions of years;
WHEREAS the vast majority of high school biology textbooks used in public schools do not present any scientific arguments against the theory of macroevolution;
WHEREAS the failure to present any scientific arguments against the theory of macroevolution may lead a student to conclude that he or she is in fact the result of random, chance processes, and has not been created or designed for any special purpose;
WHEREAS this view can have a dramatic effect on the student, leading him or her to devalue human life and possibly engage in drug abuse, sexual promiscuity, or violence, or even commit suicide;
WHEREAS it is critical that a scientific theory that has potentially disastrous social consequences be presented objectively;
WHEREAS the Conference Report for the No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, signed into law by President Bush on January 8, 2002, provides in part at H.R. Rep. 107-334, p. 703, "Where topics are taught that may generate controversy (such as biological evolution), the curriculum should help students to understand the full range of scientific views that exist ";
WHEREAS the cause of truth and the general welfare of society are both promoted if the strong scientific arguments against the theory of macroevolution are also presented; and
WHEREAS the presentation of the scientific arguments both for and against the theory of macroevolution does not in any way violate the First Amendment of the U.S. Constitution;
BE IT RESOLVED THEREFORE, in the interest of objectivity, critical thinking, and the general welfare of society:
Administrators of the public schools of ____________________ should take such action as is necessary to ensure that the theory of macroevolution is presented objectively in the classroom, with the valid scientific arguments both pro and con presented.
(Some of the scientific arguments against the theory of macroevolution are set forth in the following Appendix.)
The scientific arguments against the theory of macroevolution are of two types: (1) those that relate to the origin of life; and (2) those that relate to the origin of species.
THE ORIGIN OF LIFE
There are two main reasons why the theory of macroevolution is not a satisfactory explanation for the origin of life:
It should be noted that Darwin himself believed that the first form of life was the result of intelligent design. See last paragraph of Darwin's The Origin of Species (Sixth edition, January 1872): There is grandeur in this view of life ... having been originally breathed by the Creator into a few forms or into one ....
THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES
There are five main reasons why the theory of macroevolution is not a satisfactory explanation for the origin of species:
A Chinese paleontologist recently stated, "In China, we can criticize Darwin but not the government; in America, you can criticize the government but not Darwin." It is time for this to change.
(Further discussion of the scientific arguments against the theory of macroevolution may be found in Evolution: A Theory in Crisis (1986) by Michael Denton, a molecular biologist at the University of Otago in New Zealand; Darwin on Trial (1991) by Phillip Johnson, a professor of law at the University of California at Berkeley; Of Pandas and People (1993), a supplemental high school biology textbook; Darwin's Black Box: The Biochemical Challenge to Evolution (1996) by Michael Behe, a professor of biochemistry at Lehigh University; and Shattering the Myths of Darwinism (1997) by Richard Milton, a science journalist and design engineer based in London.)
| Download a printable PDF file of this document HERE.